Reading & Speaking: struktura argumentu i debata o demokracji

Temat 1: Czy demokracja może przetrwać w erze mediów społecznościowych?

ZA (przetrwa):

• "Digital tools have also expanded civic participation — petitions, crowdfunding, grassroots organising."
• "Democratic institutions have proven resilient against technological disruption before."
• "The problem is not the technology but the regulatory framework — which can be changed."

PRZECIW / zagrożenie:

• "Algorithmic amplification of outrage is structurally incompatible with the deliberative ideal."
• "Disinformation at scale undermines the shared epistemic framework democracy requires."
• "The attention economy rewards tribal identity over civic reasoning."

Temat 2: Czy pluralizm jest możliwy bez wspólnych wartości?

ZA pluralizmowi bez silnej wspólnoty wartości:

• "Procedural agreement — respect for rules of the game — is sufficient for democratic coexistence."
• "Demanding substantive consensus suppresses legitimate difference."
• "Diversity of values is the condition of freedom, not its threat."

PRZECIW / konieczność wspólnej podstawy:

• "Without some shared commitments — to truth, to the legitimacy of the process — pluralism collapses into conflict."
• "The rules of the game themselves rest on deeper values that must be widely shared."
• "Proceduralism without shared norms is a set of rules that can be exploited by bad actors."