Reading & Speaking: analiza literacka i debata o kanonie

Temat 1: Czy szkoły powinny rozszerzyć kanon literacki?

ZA:

• "A canon dominated by dead white male writers cannot adequately represent the diversity of human experience."
• "Exposure to literature from outside one's own cultural context is precisely the kind of enlargement education should provide."
• "The exclusion of postcolonial, women's and working-class writing is not a neutral aesthetic judgement — it reflects power."

PRZECIW / ostrożność:

• "Quality, not identity, should determine what is taught."
• "Expanding the canon risks diluting it — not every text can be read in the available time."
• "The canon, however imperfect, provides a shared cultural reference point."

Temat 2: Czy literatura może zmienić postawy?

ZA:

• "Reading fiction has been shown to increase empathy and perspective-taking."
• "Literature has historically preceded and enabled social change — from abolition to feminism."
• "Fiction allows us to inhabit perspectives we would never otherwise encounter."

PRZECIW / sceptycyzm:

• "Reading about suffering is not the same as addressing its causes."
• "People selectively engage with literature that confirms their existing values."
• "The empathy produced by fiction may substitute for rather than motivate action."