An extension of the topics of sequences, series, and limits. The sum $1+\tfrac12+\tfrac13+\cdots+\tfrac1N$ grows without bound (like $\ln N$), even though the terms $1/n$ tend to zero — strikingly different from the convergent geometric series. Nicole Oresme (c. 1350) proved the divergence by a grouping method: the condition „the terms tend to zero” is necessary, but not sufficient, for convergence.

I will give you a series — decide whether it is convergent (finite sum) or divergent (sum → ∞). Remember: terms → 0 is a necessary but not sufficient condition.
What just happened?
You kept adding ever smaller fractions. Each one is tiny, and yet the partial sum kept rising steadily — and nothing stops it. This is one of the most surprising results in analysis: even though the terms tend to zero, their sum tends to infinity.
The harmonic series:
The partial sum grows without bound, though ever more slowly — asymptotically it behaves like the natural logarithm:
More precisely , where is the Euler–Mascheroni constant. Since as , the sum has no ceiling — the series is divergent.
Why is this so surprising?
The mere fact that the terms shrink to zero does not guarantee that the sum is finite. Compare with the geometric series (the pink line on the scene):
Here the terms also tend to zero, but the sum is finite (convergent, equal to 1), because they shrink fast enough. In the harmonic series the terms shrink too slowly for the sum to stop. So the condition “the terms tend to zero” is necessary, but NOT sufficient for the series to converge.
Oresme’s proof (c. 1350):
The divergence was proved by the French scholar (bishop) Nicole Oresme in the 14th century with a brilliant method of grouping the terms: , , , and so on — each successive group gives more than . There are infinitely many such groups, so the sum exceeds any number set in advance: it must be infinite.
Why this matters for your exams:
The harmonic series is the textbook counterexample: it shows that does NOT imply convergence of the series . Remember it together with the geometric series as a “divergent vs convergent” pair.
Remember: is divergent — the sum grows like and tends to infinity, even though the terms tend to zero. The terms shrinking to zero is a necessary but not sufficient condition for convergence.
The terms , and yet the sum is infinite (a divergent series).
, then , and so on — we keep adding infinitely many „halves”.
The partial sum grows like a logarithm: The condition is necessary, but not sufficient, for convergence.
Notation: indices of terms, natural logarithm.
No — it is divergent; its sum tends to infinity (though very slowly, like ln N).
The condition „the terms tend to zero” is necessary, but not sufficient, for a series to converge.
Nicole Oresme in the 14th century (c. 1350), by a method of grouping the terms.
Teaching? Embed this experiment on your site.
Free widget — paste it on your school site, blog or notes. It links to the full version.