An extension of the topic of real numbers and polynomials. Algebraic numbers are roots of polynomials with rational coefficients (e.g. √2 → x²−2=0), whereas transcendental numbers (such as π, e) are not a root of any such polynomial. The transcendence of e was proved by Hermite (1873) and of π by Lindemann (1882). Transcendental numbers are “incomparably more numerous” than algebraic ones.

I will give you a number — decide whether it is algebraic (a root of a rational polynomial) or transcendental.
What just happened?
Real numbers split into two classes. An algebraic number is one that is a root of some nonzero polynomial with rational (integer) coefficients. This class includes all rational numbers — e.g. is a root of the equation — as well as some irrational numbers, such as , or the golden ratio . A transcendental number is one that is NOT a root of any such polynomial — it “transcends” algebra, hence the name.
√2 is algebraic — it is a root of a rational polynomial:
Although is irrational, it “closes up” under an equation — which is why it counts as an algebraic number. Likewise satisfies .
π and e are transcendental — no rational polynomial hits them:
Proving that a specific number is transcendental is very hard. Charles Hermite was the first to show the transcendence of (1873), and Ferdinand von Lindemann the transcendence of (1882) — which incidentally settled the ancient problem of squaring the circle: it is impossible with compass and straightedge precisely because is transcendental.
A surprising proportion:
Georg Cantor showed that there are only countably many algebraic numbers (cardinality ), but uncountably many real numbers (cardinality continuum ). Since the algebraic ones are “few” and the reals “incomparably more numerous”, almost every real number is transcendental — even though we know surprisingly few explicit examples.
Why this matters for your exams:
Distinguishing rational, irrational-algebraic and transcendental numbers organises the world of real numbers and recurs in problems about irrationality proofs, about roots of polynomials, and about what cannot be constructed with compass and straightedge (such as squaring the circle).
Remember: a number is algebraic when it is a root of some polynomial with rational coefficients (like for ), and transcendental when it is a root of none (like and ). Transcendentals are incomparably more numerous.
An algebraic number is a root of some polynomial with rational coefficients, e.g. satisfies . A transcendental number is not a root of any such polynomial.
and are transcendental — proofs: Hermite (1873) for , Lindemann (1882) for .
There are countably many algebraic numbers, but uncountably many reals in total — so transcendental numbers are “incomparably more numerous” (almost every number is transcendental).
Notation: the unknown of the polynomial, , .
No — π is a transcendental number, it “escapes” all of algebra.
An algebraic number is a root of a polynomial with rational coefficients (e.g. √2); a transcendental number is a root of none.
Transcendental ones — algebraic numbers are countable, while transcendental ones are uncountable (almost every number is transcendental).
Teaching? Embed this experiment on your site.
Free widget — paste it on your school site, blog or notes. It links to the full version.